
| Foundations do not need a lot of money to be effective. If, indeed, they
were to exploit only a fraction of the strategies available to them, their
individual and collective impact on American life would be vastly and
beneficially expanded. -Paul Ylvisaker, "Small Can Be Effective" |
As families become more hands-on in their philanthropy and their personal stake
in its success becomes as great as their financial commitment, the desire to
observe and track discernible outcomes grows. Families are increasingly looking
for new ways to be strategic in their giving and to maximize the positive effect
they can have on their communities. Being strategic, however, does not
necessarily mean being narrowly focused or unilateral in your giving. Instead,
it makes sense to think of being strategic as employing the variety of giving
options and vehicles available to you and your family to the greatest advantage
in each funding situation.
One of the greatest strengths of philanthropy, and family philanthropy in
particular, is its malleability in the face of constantly shifting societal
needs. In fact, philanthropy exists to fund the ideas and projects that the
government and private industry cannot or will not, due to bureaucratic red tape
or the impractical financial risk that they pose. Because family philanthropies
run as much—if not more—on heart and idealism as they do on practicality and
finance, they are liberated to be creative in the projects they fund and the
ways in which they fund them.
In this issue of Family Giving News we’ll examine some of the creative giving
options open to families today which can help your family to maximize the impact
of their grants dollars and explore the boundaries of what is possible through
your giving.
According to the most recent issue of Key Facts on Family Foundations, released by the Foundation Center, nearly 50% of all grants dollars given by family foundations went to project support in 2004. During the same period less than half of that, a little more than 20% of all dollars given went to general operating support. The figure below, excerpted from Splendid Legacy: The Guide to Creating Your Family Foundation, illustrates some of the reasons families choose these options.
| Why (Most) Grantmakers Favor Project Grants |
|
| Why (Some) Grantmakers Favor General Support Grants |
|
Before deciding to allot some portion of your available funds to general
operating support, it's important to find an organization or organizations to
fund whose goals are in keeping with your philanthropy's mission. General
operating grants, in some ways, require a greater leap of faith for families
than making a donation to a discrete program whose goals are explicitly stated
and whose outcomes are easily quantifiable. If providing general operating
support is to be a successful and fulfilling experience, you need to trust your
grantee to spend your gift wisely. And you need to feel confident that your
contribution, though its effects may not be immediately apparent, is meaningful.
This is not to say that your giving needs to fit squarely in one camp or the
other. The key to getting the most out of your giving is to be firm in your
mission, but flexible about how these goals might be achieved. Some families
feel most confident restricting their giving to project support. Others, like
this month's Profile in Family Philanthropy, the
Sobrato Foundation,
deliberately give general operating grants only. Still others might find a
comfortable, workable model in the example of the William Penn Foundation which
has a policy of adding 10% on top of the requested grant amount intended to
cover a grantee's operating costs.
Another useful model for families to consider, particularly those who are just
starting out or working with modest sums of money, is to consider giving a
challenge or matching grant. These grants involve issuing a challenge or
striking a deal with a nonprofit that commits your philanthropy to a certain
gift amount, provided the grantee raises a comparable number of funds or a
specified amount or percentage of the total funds required to run a project.
For example, suppose your family wishes to a give a grant to a local soup
kitchen, Julia's Pantry. At an annual family meeting, some family members raise
concerns about Julia's Pantry's long-term prospects for success. Your family has
been a long time supporter of the program and wishes to continue and even
increase its support, but the organization's budget appears to have shrunk in
recent years and its roster of other donors seems to be getting shorter. After
much discussion, your family agrees that Julia's Pantry is still a worthwhile
program, but that it needs a bit of a shot in the arm, both financially and from
a visibility standpoint, so you decide to offer a challenge grant: your family
will match the total gifts that Julia's Pantry can raise in the next fiscal
year, up to $20,000.
This strategy has three advantages: first, it encourages the nonprofit to
diversify its funding portfolio and intensify efforts to cultivate new donors;
second, by publicly endorsing the project you potentially help the nonprofit to
attract other donors; and third, it acts as a challenge to other philanthropists
in your area who may have shared your concerns and hesitated to fund Julia's
Pantry. In offering the nonprofit the opportunity to double its money, so to
speak, you alert other philanthropists to the opportunity to double the impact
by combining their efforts with yours.
While there's certainly nothing wrong with helping a nonprofit increase its
"earning potential," you and your family should be aware that challenge or
matching grants do have some drawbacks. Before issuing a challenge to a
nonprofit, be sure that you have assessed the organization's capacity to meet
the fundraising demands of the challenge. If a nonprofit is small or chronically
understaffed, issuing this sort of grant can be impractical and
counterproductive.
|
We want to find a way to pull in those pesky bicycle mechanics from Dayton. . . |
As Diamandis, whose $10 million
Ansari X Prize was given in 2004 to the team
that developed SpaceShipOne, the first craft designed for commercial space
travel, points out monetary prizes often appeal to scientists and great thinkers
operating outside the mainstream or in obscurity. Like those “pesky bicycle
mechanics from Dayton” whose enterprising spirit and pioneering work changed the
world, bringing us closer together faster than we ever dreamed possible, the
innovators whose ideas and energy will shape the next century are out there.
Offering a prize:
Family Giving News is published monthly by the
national center for family philanthropy
1818 N Street NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20036
http://www.ncfp.org
please be advised that the content of family giving news is for informational
purposes only, and is not intended to constitute legal advice.
If you find any broken links or have difficulty loading any of the content of family giving news, Please click here.