AUGUST 2004: How do Families Communicate Effectively
Survey Results
More than three-quarters of all respondents to our August Reader Survey
indicated that they felt it was of “very high” or “somewhat high” importance for
family foundations and philanthropists to share clear and comprehensive
information about their activities to the public at large.
Respondents rated websites (mentioned by 68% of respondents), participation
in local networks of foundations and nonprofits (58%), and published guidelines
(50%) and annual reports (39%) as the four most important ways for sharing
information about a foundation or philanthropy's activities. Interestingly, only
27% felt that completing Form 990-PFs were one of the most important ways of
sharing information.
While most individuals felt that publicizing one’s philanthropy added value
to one’s giving and was a necessary way of being accountable for one’s
grantmaking and other activities, several noted that it depends on the family,
or that the communication should come from the recipients of grants rather than
those who make them.
Specific comments and suggestions for effective communications from those
responding to the survey included:
- “Everyone has an obligation to spread the news about philanthropy and
family philanthropists are some of the best to do that – they create a model
of giving for the general public that no other entity can match.”
- “A well constructed website, combined with a thoughtful and informative
grant awards and denial process, create a good synergy to positively convey
what a foundation's mission is. In particular, clearly stating why grant
applications are approved and (as importantly) denied gets the word out to the
greater community about what you're all about.”
- “Make every effort to meet with the grantees (or grant seekers) on their
"home turf" in site visits, whether as representatives of family foundations
(staff or board) or as representatives of a donor advised fund. Being willing
to meet on site sends a strong message to the community.”
- “I personally prefer the ‘quiet no applause’ approach to charity. I say
that because so much of the media and the public at large have become cynical
and callous about the motives of the true philanthropist. Generally they see
philanthropy as nothing more or less than another mechanism to manipulate or
promote an agenda. I do not have the time or resources to convince those of
the ‘buy-sell’ world that there is another perspective called: ‘Give-Receive.’
Our family foundation has embraced the latter because of all the intangible
benefits that it provides for the family as well as the community at large."
- "Creating public awareness not only brings attribution to the Foundation
but reminds the public about the role private funding contributes to society
as a whole. The skepticism created through media coverage of scandals and
fiduciary mismanagement needs to be balanced with the positive message of what
is being accomplished.”
- “Some families prefer not to have an ‘image’ at all--- some prefer
to remain under the radar, while others enjoy a bit more of the limelight.
What is important is that their giving is structured, published (guidelines
and annual report), and true to their mission. Consistency is the best image.”
- “I think the community recipients of grants should do a better job
of informing the greater population at large of the importance of grants and
those who make them.”
- “The presentation needs to reflect the individual values of the
organization. A standard government form takes this away, and reduces public
understanding of what motivated the donor and how the foundation can engage
the public in its mission. Trying to communicate the dreams and vision of the
charitable donor is the key to expanding the interest of the public in "good
works" of the charity; and this results in the biggest public value for
permitting the tax benefits that any foundation might enjoy.”
See below for full results of the survey.
 |
 |
| 1. How
important is it for family foundations and
philanthropists to share clear and comprehensive
information about their activities to the public
at
large? | | | |
 |
|
Response Percent |
Response Total |
|
|
 |
3.6% |
5 |
|
|
 |
5.8% |
8 |
|
|
 |
13% |
18 |
|
|
 |
29.7% |
41 |
|
|
 |
47.8% |
66 |
| Total
Respondents |
138 |
| (skipped this
question) |
0 | | |
 | |
 |
 |
 |
| 2. If
you think it is important, what are the best
ways for sharing information about a foundation
or philanthropy's activities? Please select up
to 3 responses
only | | | |
 |
|
Response Percent |
Response Total |
 |
|
990-PF form for Private
Foundations | |
 |
27.5% |
38 |
 |
|
Interviews with press and
media | |
 |
18.1% |
25 |
 |
|
Participation in local networks of
foundations and
nonprofits | |
 |
58% |
80 |
 |
|
Including community representatives
in the grants decision-making
process | |
 |
13.8% |
19 |
 |
|
Published annual
report | |
 |
39.1% |
54 |
 |
|
Website | |
 |
68.1% |
94 |
 |
|
Published
guidelines | |
 |
50% |
69 |
 |
|
Other (please
specify) | |
 |
13% |
18 |
| Total
Respondents |
138 |
| (skipped this
question) |
0 | | |
 | |
 |
Family Giving News
Home
Family Giving News is published monthly by the
national center for family philanthropy
1818 N Street NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20036
http://www.ncfp.org
please be advised that the content of family giving news is for informational
purposes only, and is not intended to constitute legal advice.