Developing Investment Strategy


When considering your investment strategy, it's best to focus on the investment process and policies—not the details.

A good place to start might be payout, the amount of charitable distributions foundations must make in in a given year, usually around five percent of the value of the foundation’s assets. Grants to charities, administrative expenses associated with grantmaking, and amounts paid to acquire assets used in carrying out the purposes of the fund count toward this payout. Investment management fees, brokerage fees, custodial fees, and salaries or board meeting expenses to oversee investments do not.

With a clear picture of what the payout requirement means for your foundation, you’ll know what the foundation must do with its dollars. Consider next what the foundation and the family want to do, keeping the charitable purpose of the foundation in mind.

  • How might your program goals be achieved?
  • Do you want to spend now or spend later?
  • Do you want to meet or exceed payout?
  • Do you wish to grow the endowment or simply maintain its inflation-adjusted value?
  • Are more assets coming or is the foundation fully funded?

These questions inform your foundation’s return requirements (the amount that your foundation’s investment assets will need to earn, minus expenses and inflation, to meet the law’s requirements and your own program goals). From there, your asset allocation (the kinds of investments your foundation should make to meet or exceed your return requirements in keeping with your tolerance for risk). Manage risk by diversifying across asset classes and investing to meet return objectives, not to maximize returns.

Consider also the possibilities of socially responsible investing through:

  • Investment screens (avoiding or pursuing certain types of investments because of environmental, moral, social, or other concerns)
  • Community investing
  • Proxy voting
  • Microfinance
  • Program-related investments

From thoughtful consideration of these questions and the counsel of trusted advisors, you will develop an investment policy that covers your objectives, how investments will be monitored, desired asset allocation, and performance benchmarks. With this vision in mind, investment managers and custodians can handle the day-to-day details, overseen by an investment committee and trusted advisors and consultants.
 

Related Reading

Giving Until It Hurts: Coping With a Tough Economy

2003
In early 2003, following two years of steady stock market declines, many nonprofits faced what commentators described as a 'perfect storm' in their funding. This Passages issue paper describes strategies that foundations and non-profits have used to survive these cut backs.
[POE5c] [PC2]

Developing a Spending Policy

1999
Although federal law dictates minimum annual spending requirements for private foundations, every family has preferences in how, and how much, it chooses to give each year. Should a foundation limit itself to the 5 percent-of-assets requirement? Should principle be invaded? This chapter from 'Investment Issues for Family Funds' suggests ways to approach answering these and other questions.

Developing and Overseeing an Investment Strategy

1999
A successful investment strategy for family funds and foundations depends on both a sound process and well thought-out, written policies. This chapter from 'Investment Issues for Family Funds' describes how a foundation's spending policy and organizational objectives are linked to development of a cohesive and integrated investment strategy. Trustees can ensure effective investment management policies and guidelines for investment advisors and managers, as described here.
[POE5b]

Alternatives to Perpetuity: A Conversation Every Foundation Should Have

2005
This Passages is aimed at new donors considering a limited lifespan for their foundation, existing foundations that have already set a closing date, or any family contemplating the question of perpetuity. Author Deanne Stone gives background on the perpetuity vs. spending down debate and discusses the motivations for considering an alternative to perpetuity. The paper then identifies the basic challenges that foundations often faces when looking to spend down their assets: redefining goals, changing investment and spending strategies, communicating with grantees and the public, preparing grantees to find replacement funds, anticipating staff needs, attending to legal requirements, and planning their legacies.

[PC6]